Book Review

The Remembering Process

Lilly 1 CWI have a curious relationship with time. As a past life regressionist, I know that it is easy to tap into the past and sometimes my clients visit the future as well. Knowing that time is like a stream flowing past, with the molecules of every moment flowing and accessible with just the dip of our net, I was drawn to The Remembering Process by Daniel Barrett. The book lays out a process to remember the future whenever we want our creative process to springboard past now to a place where it has already been completed.White daisy violet center 1 CW

Mr. Barrett is appears to be a driven creative. He has excelled as a musician, a music producer, and a software technical writer. He has collaborated with singer-songwriter Joe Vitale in The Remembering Process to illustrate a way to remember things that have not yet occurred in linear time. Impossible? Maybe. Useful technique? Perhaps so. To use this process, you have to be willing to be playful with your imagination. You must be willing to set aside your attachment to what you KNOW and consider what could be.

Mr. Barrett provides loose directions for two levels of ability. For the novice, he provides the remembering process as a useful way to employ your imagination to conceive of different possibilities. For experienced metaphysicist or one who can connect with his quantum self, he proposes a way to pull information from the future to the now to infuse the creative process with possibilities. Mr. Vitale has used this process to write several musical albums and swears by its effectiveness.

book coverI admit that I haven’t knowingly tried this process, so I can’t report its effectiveness at either level. But I am thinking about it, and wondering when and how to give it a try. I’m a risk taker and don’t see a downside here. Whether I’m drawing from the future, my imagination, or something else, if it leads me to new and novel ideas that help me in my creative endeavors, then who cares where it came from? You can buy a copy here (Amazon).

This was an interesting read, and it dovetailed nicely with Quantum Creativity. 

FTC Disclosure: I received this book for free from Hay House Publishing for this review. The opinion in this review is unbiased and reflects my honest judgment of the product.

Aspen grove 1 CW

16 replies »

  1. I really like Joe Vitale and I will definitely check out this book that you’re recommending. Of course, I think I have to try the novice tactic. Past life, yes, I get it. Future…interesting concept and I’m not against it ~ I just need to read more about quantum physics…it’s on my to do list along with a million other things, but it’s there. Thank you Karel. ♥

    Like

    • It’s not so hard for some people to reach the future. I’ve done it many times, but with other techniques. If you’ve had déjà vu, you’ve gotten information from the future too.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Paul and I have both been interested in quantum physics for a while. There is something very challenging and almost mystical about the subject. We real books about it that can be easily understood since my mind and ability to understand is limited.
    Gregg Braden writes about quantum physics on a simple level. So does Deepak Chopra. Just because I don’t fully understand it all doesn’t mean it does not exist, in fact something within me knows it is important and deserves attention.

    Please share your experience if you choose to do the process.

    Like

  3. This sounds like the author must believe in predestination. If the future is already predetermined, then where is free will? Is he really tuning into the future or into his imagination? He cannot tell, and neither can anyone else until they have lived long for that future to be the past.

    It presents some interesting philosophical questions.

    Mom

    Like

    • There are a bunch of ideas at play here, including parallel dimensions (rather than predestination ) and lots of imagination. You’re right- the author will never be able to prove his ideas. It truly is just a philosophical argument or an inspiration tool.

      Like

      • Future and past – If the future is already predetermined. The intuitive novice in me says that this would be a way to create that future. It’s one of the many possibilities, and by envisioning it, you help it be the happen that happens. Also, since all is about energy – if one envisions that possibility and believes in it (aka all their energy is attuned to those “tracks”) then so it is.

        A semi-P.S. I’m actually not a novice to science and physics at all and all this has always been intuitive to me. I like to be wrong though, means there’s more to learn. Always more to learn. I like to look at everything as much as a novice as I can – childlike openness. And of course I didn’t read the book so this is all just immediate feeling.

        I do see the possibilities here easily: All energy, time, matter, place is connected (and that’s a novice way to say it) – so why would future be any less connected to this moment than the past is. Especially if you think of parallel dimensions there are just as many potential pasts as there are potential futures. You are the center, the creator of your own energy, thoughts – so why wouldn’t your intuition of your own future be the one that creates that very precise thing.

        My two cents. 😉 Fun stuff. If I’m wrong, super. Might be much better than this. 😉

        Like

        • Now the version without the grammar errors and incomplete sentences 😉

          Future and past – and the question whether the future is already predetermined in this theory:

          The intuitive novice in me says that this would be a way to create that future. It’s one of the many possibilities, and by envisioning it, you help it be the one that happens. Also, since all is about energy – if one envisions that possibility and believes in it (aka all their energy is attuned to those “tracks”) then so it is.

          A semi-P.S. I’m actually not a novice to science and physics at all, and all this has always been intuitive to me. I like to be wrong though, means there’s more to learn. Always more to learn. I like to look at everything as much as a novice as I can – childlike openness. And of course I didn’t read the book so this is all just immediate feeling.

          I do see the possibilities here easily: All energy, time, matter, place is connected (and that’s a novice way to say it) – so why would future be any less connected to this moment than the past is. Especially if you think of parallel dimensions there are just as many potential pasts as there are potential futures. You are the center, the creator of your own energy, thoughts – so why wouldn’t your intuition of your own future be the one that creates that very precise thing.

          My two cents. 😉 Fun stuff. If I’m wrong, super. Might be much better than this. 😉

          Like

  4. This post put me in mind of Einstein. He said something along the lines that science was nothing without imagination. He thought he meant imagination is the place where limitless possibilities exist. Otherwise we can only know what we know…which leads on to quantum physics and fractals.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s